![]() ![]() ![]() That’s the real big difference between these two bands. But the Stones went on, we started doing stadium gigs in the ’70s and still doing them now. “ They did a great gig, and I was there, at Shea stadium. “ So that business started in 1969 and the Beatles never experienced that,” Jagger continued. They broke up before that business started, the touring business for real.” “ The big difference, though, is and sort of slightly seriously, is that The Rolling Stones is a big concert band in other decades and other areas when The Beatles never even did an arena tour, Madison Square Garden with a decent sound system. There’s obviously no competition,” he responded. Soon after McCartney’s Stern appearance, Mick Jagger was asked for a response during an interview with the BBC. There’s a lot of differences, and I love the Stones, but I’m with you. “ When they are writing stuff, it has to do with the blues. “ They are rooted in the blues,” McCartney said of the Stones. McCartney made similar comments in an interview with Howard Stern last year. “ I think our net was cast a bit wider than theirs.” “ I’m not sure I should say it, but they’re a blues cover band, that’s sort of what the Stones are,” he said. In an interview with The New Yorker, McCartney compared The Stones unfavourably to The Beatles. “ But as a band, if you were outside a pub and you heard that music coming out of a pub some night, you’d think, ‘Well, that’s a mediocre pub band!’,” he sniped.ĭaltrey is the second of The Rolling Stones contemporaries to mock the rockers in recent weeks, following disparaging comments from Paul McCartney. However, when pressed for his opinion of the Stones’ musical talents, Daltrey wasn’t so affable. “ He’s the number one rock ‘n’ roll performer.” “ You’ve got to take your hat off to him,” he said. I think if we're not careful it's probably the end of our civilisation.Asked about The Rolling Stones, Daltrey opened his answer in charitable form, praising frontman Mick Jagger. He said: "I never thought any good would come of it, and I still don't think anything good's come of it. And I suddenly thought, 'I wonder what it would have been like being in a band like that!'"Īnd in the wide-ranging chat, the 'My Generation' hitmaker predicted that the internet will be "probably the end of our civilisation". He said you could go off and read a book when Page started up on a guitar solo or Bonham stated on a drum solo. Robert Plant - Percy, as we call him - he's a very good friend of mine, and we do joke about it. He explained: “I managed to get the short straw of all the singers in all the bands. He’s gonna join us in the blues cover band.”Įlsewhere in the interview, Daltrey admitted he has always envied Led Zepellin frontman and close pal Robert Plant. Jagger, 78, continued the pair's back-and-forth at the 'Paint it Black' rockers' SoFi Stadium gig in Los Angeles recently, where he quipped on stage: “Paul McCartney is here. “I think our net was cast a bit wider than theirs.” He said: “I’m not sure I should say it, but they’re a blues cover band, that’s sort of what the Stones are. The Beatles legend, 79, has made no secret of the fact he believes the 'Let it Be' hitmakers were better than the 'Honky Tonk Women' group, and last month, he insisted they had more range than the blues-orientated band. ![]() He then quipped: "But as a band, if you were outside a pub and you heard that music coming out of a pub some night, you'd think, 'Well, that's a mediocre pub band!'" He's the number one rock 'n' roll performer." Speaking to the Coda Collection, Daltrey said: "Mick Jagger, you've got to take your hat off to him. The Who frontman, 77, made the comment after Sir Paul McCartney labelled Sir Mick Jagger's band "a blues cover band". Roger Daltrey has branded The Rolling Stones a "mediocre pub band".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |